About Short Sales

for everything you need to know about short sales, REO and bank owned properties.

Archive for the ‘Short Sales’ Category

Endless Diversion In Short Sales With Bank Of America

Monday, November 1st, 2010

Almost any real estate agent trying to work out a short sale deal with Bank of America will express frustrations with the slow and painful process. Bank of America is dealing with more short sales than any other company, in large part due to their acquisition of Countrywide Home Loans which was notorious for offering bad loans during the housing boom.

There are a number of things why a short sale transaction in Bank of America is rather difficult compared to other companies. One, Bank of America only approves a short sale file with only one agent. They don not allow the same agent to represent both sides of the transaction.

I’m sure they are doing this because they feel it will help them to get the best purchase price for each home they need to approve, and will help them stay out of potential legal issues. But, for real estate agents who have BOA short sales listed, this can be a royal pain when they have a buyer who is interested in a property they have listed.

Bank of America compels home buyers to be prequalified with BOA before they will accept a short sale offer even if they know they are already qualified. On the other hand, potential buyers and real estate agents find this requirement a mess. Indeed a smart move for Bank of America.

If we step back and look at short sales from the view of Bank of America, it is a really tough situation they are in. They are losing millions every day. And while the policy’s they have are annoying for real estate agents, as a business, they have to do what they can to try and make a profit, or at least reduce their losses.

Bank of America is wasting America’s money! In my state at the present, they have paid the attorney’s fees to foreclose approximately at a low end of $40K and surely will continue to face the same or worse market conditions.

For Short Sales buying tips, visit Bountiful UT Homes for Sale and Real Estate in Utah.

Short Sales VS Foreclosures

Tuesday, October 5th, 2010

Between Short sales and Foreclosures, banks, lenders, and even homeowners would rather have a short sale home than a foreclosed property. For the reason that both have impending financial consequences. However, it shows that both parties are better off with short sale. Foreclosure is such a very expensive solution as most banks suggest. Moreover, CoreLogic reports that that the rate of short selling has tripled since 2008 in entire state.

It seems that the rate of short selling has tripled since 2008, according to the recent study conducted by CoreLogic, a leading innovative analytics, information and outsourcing solutions for businesses and government seeking dynamic insights.

Furthermore, short sales will continue to be a significant factor in the real estate industry. The study showed that 55.8% of all short sales occurred in California, Florida, Texas, and Arizona, during 2009 and 2010, and roughly 4% of short sales have a subsequent resale within 18 months.

Data shows that 5.2 perecent of Logan Utah homes for sale are listed as short sales, and 3.62 percent for Cache Valley Homes were short sales. Utah can be a good source of short sale homes with the number of short sales increasing this year.

A short sale is indeed s foreseeable yet important part of the mortgage industry’s post-crises stabilization process. Homeowners can now survive from drowning in their mortgage interests and from the threat of foreclosures with short sales. Well, short sale is the hero, the lesser of two evil since losses can be minimized if properly initiated not only by banks andn lenders, but also the homeowners.

The number of short sale propertiesare increasing in the real estate market, shows that home prices have lowered down, but the other side is that it also made the home buying to a large extent more difficult. This article, Short Sales VS Foreclosures has free reprint rights.

Do I Owe Anything After A Short-Sale?

Saturday, September 11th, 2010

As horrible it is to lose your home to foreclosure, ex-homeowners may still be on the bait for the deficiency amount. This is simply the difference of what is owed on the mortgage and what the bank could sell at an auction. “Deficiency judgments” can haunt borrowers, years after they have lost their home.

It can happen to homeowners who have achieved short-sales where the bank had approved selling the home for less than what it was worth.

Vanessa Corey who performed a short-sale on her Fredericksburg, VA home in Apr of 2008 is a genuine illustration. After remodeling her place in 2004, unexpected events which led straight to a sour divorce and the burst of the housing bubble, compelled her to sell her home via a short-sale.

As a property agent, she assumed the lender had agreed to disregard the difference in amount owed after the short-sale. Late last year, her legal representative produced a letter from her lender with a demand to pay an owed amount of $65,000. As she didn’t have the money, she declared bankruptcy.

Many lenders refuse to comment regarding the issue of ‘deficiency judgments’. In the case of Corey’s lender, BT&T clearly indicated that they were pursuing more homeowners with deficiencies.

Are You Protected From A Deficiency Judgment? Whether banks can pursue such a feat depends on several factors including what state the borrower lives in. Other factors include whether there is a second mortgage or other liens involved. It can certainly haunt borrowers if they chose to ignore the possibilities of deficiencies.

Real-estate attorney, Mr. Zaretsky mentioned that if your financial lender has achieved a judgment on the borrower, they can target you despite of your location. They have the power to ask for your financial records, hold your wages and put you in jail if you continued to turn away from their requests.

Financial firms can legally impose deficiency judgments in more than thirty states with the inclusion Fla, NY and TX states.

Luckily they do not allow ‘deficiency judgments’ in California and Arizona. Other states that prohibit these judgments include Wisconsin, South Carolina, Washington, Pennsylvania, Oregon, N. Dakota, Alaska, Iowa and Montana.

Although lenders are willing to forgive the deficiency amount, many borrowers are not aware that they are required to request for a release. To avoid any unforeseen surprises, ensure that your attorney requests the bank to release you of any future obligations.

According to Zaretsky, people should not have a false sense of security thinking that a deficiency judgment will not come back and haunt them. He expects many of the deficiency judgments will be filed over the next few years as many of these accounts were sold at discounts to numerous collection agencies and third parties. These organizations would not have bought these accounts if they were not planning on recouping their initial investments.

Banks or collection firms do not act in obtaining judgments right away. As a strategy, they may act patient and allow debtors to financially improve prior to filing with the legal system. For example, banks have up to five years to file in Florida state. Once judgment is obtained, the bank has up to twenty years to pursue the debt with interest.

Lenders and collection agencies can come after borrowers regardless of how small the debt. Case in point, Richard Varno and his wife short-sold their Nashville house in 2004 when he became unemployed. Four years later in 2008, the second lien holder was after him for $25,000. He argued by informing them that they had released the title and he was no longer liable.

Unfortunately, that was not the case. The release of the title does not mean that the debt will be extinguished. Due to the diverse variations in state laws, in general, a mortgage responsibility consists of 2 parts. The first part is the collateral in which the pledge is the asset or house. The second part is the promise and agreement to pay back the loan.

Lenders may release property liens so as to enable a short-sale transaction but not necessarily releasing borrowers’ obligations to pay back the loan based on the promissory notes. Upon the sale of the home, the secured debt can transform into an unsecured debt.

Zaretsky claimed that one of his clients’ who was so excited in obtaining a short-sale, carelessly signed all the documents that his real estate agent provided him including a confession that clearly made him still legally liable for the debt.

He was unaware that the financial institution could take that document and transform it into a deficiency judgment through the legal system.

Lenders can also be unreliable. Zaretsky had another client who was willing and financially able to pay off the deficiency but the bank did not bother asking as they reserve the right to pursue the deficiency judgment at a later point.

Property agent Mr. Tolchinsky from Florida, mentioned that banks can sometimes pursue borrowers who abandon their home with the knowledge that they may have money or other assets they can pursue.

Financial institutions may conduct due diligence to see if the home was abandoned due to real reasons of the borrowers’ financial hardship. It this was not the case, the financial institution will come after the borrower for the remaining debt.

If in doubt, it is advisable to seek legal advice to ensure that your short-sale or deed in lieu agreement does not contain any deficiencies therefore allowing your lender to pursue you in the future. To alleviate any risks, it is important for your attorney or counselor to negotiate the deficiency out of the short-sale or deed in lieu contract.

Receive free foreclosure prevention information by learning about the latest announcements on government programs such as HAMP and HAFA. Download the Free Podcast about Can My Lender Pursue A Deficiency Judgment From A Short Sale? for your own use, blog or website.